By Eurohoops team / info@eurohoops.net
The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal, the independent body officially recognized by FIBA, which provides resolution services for disputes between players, agents, coaches, and clubs through arbitration, has published a set of BAT COVID-19 Guidelines.
Given the extraordinary situation caused by the current COVID-19 pandemic and in order to provide greater legal certainty to the basketball community, the Guidelines have been issued by the BAT President Prof. Dr. Ulrich Haas, the BAT Vice-President Raj Parker, and all BAT Arbitrators. They are intended to provide actual and potential BAT users with guidance in proceedings and help facilitate amicable settlements within the basketball community.
COVID-19 Guidelines
Issued on 20 April 2020 by the
BAT President, Vice-President and Arbitrators
The world currently finds itself in an extraordinarily difficult situation due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the
measures taken by governments to palliate its effects and the consequences of both on businesses and
employees in all sectors of activity.
Inevitably, professional basketball has been significantly affected by the crisis, especially in that most
competitions have been suspended or even terminated early. This, in turn, raises legal issues regarding
contracts in professional basketball, in particular in employment relationships of players and coaches
with clubs. Many parties to contracts in basketball have approached BAT, or FIBA, in the past weeks to
inquire how such legal issues would be handled by BAT Arbitrators.
Of course, each case has to and will be judged on its merits by the respective BAT Arbitrator, taking into
account all relevant circumstances and deciding ex aequo et bono unless otherwise agreed by the
parties (Article 15 of the BAT Arbitration Rules). However, the BAT President, Vice-President and
Arbitrators have decided that the truly exceptional situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic calls for
an exceptional step on their part, with a view to providing the basketball community with greater legal
certainty, thereby also facilitating amicable settlements.
For this purpose, the BAT President, Vice-President and Arbitrators, having collectively discussed
pursuant to Article 16.1 of the BAT Arbitration Rules1 certain substantive issues that arise as a result of
the COVID-19 pandemic, set out in these Guidelines their shared views on what they would perceive to
be just and fair solutions, under the ex aequo et bono standard, to those substantive issues.
For the avoidance of any misunderstanding, five caveats must be made:
– First, these Guidelines are of a temporary nature only, aiming to address the consequences of
the COVID-19 crisis on contracts in basketball, in particular those consequences arising out of
domestic championships being suspended or terminated early as a result of the pandemic.
– Second, these Guidelines incorporate principles only, to which there may be exceptions
depending on the circumstances of the individual case (including, e.g., applicable public health
guidelines).
– Third, these Guidelines merely reflect a consensus reached by the BAT President, VicePresident and Arbitrators in their informal discussions on abstract legal issues. They are not
binding rules of mandatory application and, as a matter of course, they do not affect each
BAT Arbitrator’s liberty of decision in deciding an individual BAT case.
– Fourth, these Guidelines do not amend or substitute for the BAT Arbitration Rules or other rules
of procedure governing international arbitrations.
– Fifth, these Guidelines will be constantly reviewed and may be subject to adjustments
depending on relevant developments.
That being said, the principles agreed on by the BAT President, Vice-President and Arbitrators are as
follows:
I. Definition
1. In these Guidelines, the term “Lockdown Period” refers to the period starting on the date of
suspension/termination of the relevant 2019/20 domestic championship and ending on the date
on which the championship is resumed, or the original end date if it is not resumed.
II. Priority of Amicable Settlements
2. Amicable settlements are the preferred means of resolving disputes arising out of the COVID-19
crisis. Parties are under a duty to renegotiate in good faith the terms of their contract in order to
resolve on an amicable basis contractual issues arising from the pandemic.
3. Any breach of this duty may be taken into account by the arbitrator when deciding the merits of
the case and when deciding on arbitration costs, legal fees and other expenses.
4. Absent any general grounds for invalidity, amicable settlements entered into with a view to
addressing the consequences of the COVID-19 crisis will be respected by the arbitrator. This is
irrespective of whether the contents of the settlement are consistent with the further principles
set out below.
5. Amicable Settlements entered into after the beginning of the Lockdown Period will be rebuttably
presumed to have been executed by the parties with a view to addressing the consequences of
the COVID-19 crisis.
III. New Contracts entered into after the beginning of the Lockdown Period
6. The principles enshrined in these Guidelines do not apply, in principle, to contracts entered into
after the beginning of the Lockdown Period. These contracts will be rebuttably presumed to
have taken into account the effects of the COVID-19 crisis. The same applies, in principle, to
contracts that have been extended either by agreement of the parties or unilaterally by the club
after the beginning of the Lockdown Period.
IV. Allocation of risk
7. Clauses simply providing for a “fully guaranteed” or “no-cut” contract do not allocate economic
risks associated with the COVID-19 crisis to any of the parties to the contract.
8. The consequences of the COVID-19 crisis cannot be allocated to one of the parties only, absent
any clear contractual language stipulating otherwise for events sufficiently similar to the current
pandemic and its consequences on basketball competitions. Without such clear language in the
contract, the adverse consequences of the COVID-19 crisis shall be shared by both parties
according to their respective circumstances. Conversely, where the contract contains clear
language on how to allocate risks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the arbitrator will only depart
from such agreement, in accordance with established BAT jurisprudence, if the effects of such
risk allocation would be grossly inequitable.
V. Termination and term of contracts
9. The principle of pacta sunt servanda shall be generally upheld in a manner consistent with the
standing jurisprudence of the BAT in times of the COVID-19 crisis. Consequently, a contract is
not automatically terminated because of the pandemic. Neither does the COVID-19 crisis give
either party just cause to unilaterally terminate the contract.
10. If the contract has been terminated by either party before the Lockdown Period, it will be
rebuttably presumed that the contract was not terminated because of the COVID-19 crisis. In
such case, the standing jurisprudence of BAT related to lawful/unlawful termination will apply.
11. When calculating damages for any unlawful termination not related to the COVID-19 crisis, the
arbitrators will, in principle, not take into account the hypothetical impact that the COVID-19
crisis would potentially have had on the contract had it run its normal course. In particular, in
case of any unlawful termination by a club that is unrelated to the COVID-19 crisis, the
Guidelines on reductions of players’ and coaches’ salaries (no. 16 below) shall, in principle, not
apply to the calculation of damages or outstanding remunerations under the contract. The onus
of proof that the Guidelines exceptionally apply for reasons of equity shall be on the respective
club. Elements that may be taken into account in this context are, in particular, the nature, the
motive and the gravity of the contractual breach committed, the vicinity of the breach to the
Lockdown Period and the behavior of the parties subsequent to the breach. In case there are
reasons to deviate from the above principle, i.e. non-application of the Guidelines, preference
should be given to deferring the maturity of some of the claims to the beginning of the 2020/21
season.
12. If a domestic championship extends its 2019/20 season beyond the original end date to
compensate (at least partially) for the Lockdown Period, the contracts between its participating
clubs and their players and coaches will remain in force until the date of the last match of the
respective club for that season, unless it is clear from the contract that the parties had intended
for the contract to expire before the end of the (original) 2019/2020 season, or unless it would
otherwise be grossly inequitable.
13. If, before the Lockdown Period, a player or coach has entered into a contract for the 2020/21
season with another team and the extended term (no. 12 above) of his or her contract for the
2019/20 season results in both contracts overlapping in time, the player/coach, the old club and
the new club shall seek in good faith to solve the problem by amicable settlement, taking account
of the interests involved in a proportionate and equitable manner.