By Nikos Varlas/ varlas@eurohoops.net
The season gets under way in a few days and the time has come for the top 100 Euroleague Rankings. A difficult concept, subjective, one that – by nature – creates differing opinions and disagreements!
Eurohoops begins the presentation from the bottom up and the main thing that has to be made clear is that our Rankings are not made based on those that are published about NBA players in the USA. It’s true that the individual element is very important, but we equally evaluate the team’s dynamics and potential.
Criteria
1. PLAYER’S VALUE: The overall competitive evaluation of players. The characteristics of their game, their worth, their leadership skills, their quality as a unit independent of the team they play for.
2. PLAYER’S ROLE: The importance of a player for their team as we evaluate and predict it for the new season.
3. TEAM’S WORTH: The team the player we choose plays for, its apparent value in the league in the long term and the potential it has. How far the player’s team that is chosen for the new Euroleague season can go.
4. INDIVIDUAL POTENTIAL: The individual potential of the player, exclusively. The extent to which they can grow and improve, how high they can go based on their value, talent and age.
5. THE NUMBERS: The statistics we speculate the player can tally on average, when their team’s run in the Euroleague is completed. This is definitely an important criterion but the last priority for our choices, since it depends directly on the quality of the team they play for and their role in the team.
These are the 5 criteria that we factor in in order to reach an overall assessment of every player individually and from that point to draw the Top 100 Ranks. If you consider that around 240 players are registered on the rosters of the Euroleague, you will comprehend how hard and tortuous it was to make these selections!
So many players of value that we respect infinitely for whom there was not enough space and, really, from a total of 150 players, the list of the 100 was drawn up with great difficulty. Especially in the bottom 20 slots, there could be any name from the 50 that were necessarily not included and we ask for your understanding for this in advance.
If you missed it, here’s our 100 to 91 rankings the 90 to 81, 80 to 71, 70-61, 60-51 and 50-41 as well.
So let’s continue to countdown.
#40 Erick Green 1990 1m.91 G Olympiacos
He has returned to the Euroleague after his term in Siena, this time to a traditional power of European basketball, with a bigger contract and more responsibilities. A scorer, with an explosive first step, a threat from any range. A big bet whether and how he will click with Spanoulis and whether he will turn out to be important for the Greek team returning to successes, after what was an unsuccessful season. Another challenge for Green will be the kind of contribution he will be able to make on nights when he’s off the target and whether, aside from scoring, he will be able to create for his teammates and make them better.
#39 James Augustine 1984 2m.08 C CSKA Moscow
He has a very good touch with the basket from close and mid-range and he has high percentages in two-point shooting. He was acquired by CSKA in order to provide extra support in the low post, and with creators such as Teodosic and De Colo, common sense says that he’ll be able to ease his way into scoring with effectiveness and an economy of attempts. His playing time, though, as well as his role are also going to be determined by his consistency in defense, since Dimitrios Itoudis demands a lot from all of his players on both ends of the court.